• X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact us
  • Login
  • More Information
    • Solutions For:
      • Food Safety Management
      • Supplier Quality Management
      • Enterprise Food Safety
      • Audit Management 360
      • Business Intelligence Dashboards
      • Remote Working and Oversight
    • Technology
      • Software Modules
      • Platform & Data Security
      • Available Languages
      • Standards We Support
  • By Industry
    • Bakeries
    • Seafood Processors
    • Beverage Manufacturers
    • Pet Food & Animal Feed
  • Customer Stories
    • Testimonials
    • UK: Butternut Box
    • EU: Royal FrieslandCampina
    • EU: Hofseth
    • USA: Bluegrass Ingredients
  • Support
    • Technical Support
    • Professional Services
    • Customer Success
    • Education & Training
  • Resources
    • ROI Calculator
    • ROI Report
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Datasheets
      • Physical Hazard Series
      • Chemical Hazard Series
      • Microbiological Hazard Series
      • Food Safety Management Series
    • Presentations
    • Ebooks
    • Tools
  • Blog
  • Company
    • About Safefood 360°
    • Contact Us
  • Demo Request
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • More Information
    • Solutions For:
      • Food Safety Management
      • Supplier Quality Management
      • Enterprise Food Safety
      • Audit Management 360
      • Business Intelligence Dashboards
      • Remote Working and Oversight
    • Technology
      • Software Modules
      • Platform & Data Security
      • Available Languages
      • Standards We Support
  • By Industry
    • Bakeries
    • Seafood Processors
    • Beverage Manufacturers
    • Pet Food & Animal Feed
  • Customer Stories
    • Testimonials
    • UK: Butternut Box
    • EU: Royal FrieslandCampina
    • EU: Hofseth
    • USA: Bluegrass Ingredients
  • Support
    • Technical Support
    • Professional Services
    • Customer Success
    • Education & Training
  • Resources
    • ROI Calculator
    • ROI Report
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Datasheets
      • Physical Hazard Series
      • Chemical Hazard Series
      • Microbiological Hazard Series
      • Food Safety Management Series
    • Presentations
    • Ebooks
    • Tools
  • Blog
  • Company
    • About Safefood 360°
    • Contact Us
  • Demo Request

Tag Archive for: food safety

Facing and Controlling Cross-Contamination in Food Processing

in blog, Food Safety Knowledge

Cross-contamination can occur at virtually any stage in the flow of food processing, and prevention is crucial.

Understanding where and how it can happen makes prevention easier, and the four most common routes of cross-contamination are outlined below:

1. One of the main means of cross-contamination is actually the individual who handles the food.

For instance, food can become contaminated if a worker who was dealing with raw chicken earlier didn’t effectively wash his/her hands prior to handling ready-to-eat products or if they forgot to put on gloves, or perhaps they are wearing a soiled uniform.

2. Another route of cross-contamination is unclean equipment where an uncontaminated meal can come into contact with an unhygienic utensil, part of a device or maybe an unclear work area.

For instance; if the raw material receiving truck driver did not wash down their truck before carrying the materials, then there is a chance that the raw material is contaminated.

3. Cross-contamination can also occur due to direct transfer between various foods, say when a meal drips contaminated juices onto another meal. The most common example here is the storage of uncooked meat besides ready-to-eat food products.

4. Transfer of food allergens from an allergenic food to non-allergenic food is also one of the means of cross-contamination.

Mislabeling and mishandling of food products are justifications for allergen cross-contamination.
It is not too difficult to imagine a scenario where the worker who is transferring the food from the temporary storage room to the packaging area takes a detour to the processing area and unintentionally walks by the wheat production area.

Food allergies are a significant problem for individuals who have to contend with them.

Not only this, but the company might face lawsuits and gain a bad reputation due to their mishandlings of food products.

Now that we have established the most common means of cross-contamination, let’s look at the different ways by which you can successfully avoid them.

Personal Hygiene

A well-designed personal hygiene program is a must when it comes to avoiding cross-contamination.

It is highly likely that food handlers will transmit foreign material from their skin, hand, or hair without a proper hygiene program in place.

The following program will highlight different best practices in food handling such as handwashing, glove use, and hand care.

The aim is to reduce the possibility of food cross-contamination through employee awareness.

This prerequisite program should also include personal habits such as bathing, clean clothing (and the importance of a clean uniform), and the use of hair and beard nets at all times.

The health of employees is another factor that influences cross-contamination.

An unwell employee should be removed from any area where there is a moderate likelihood of food or related ingredients becoming infected.

It is important to know if employees are healthy or if they have any disease or illness that could contaminate your food product.

Therefore, regular inspection and medical screening prior to employment should be conducted and a record of illness and injury should also be maintained.

Blog anchor food safety software oversight

Workers’ hands must be washed thoroughly and every so often while handling the food.

For instance, after handling raw meat, seafood or after using the restroom, they must remember to wash their hands, and after washing their hands it is vital to ensure that they are dried properly by using paper towels.

Finally, they should sanitize their hands prior to returning to work.

Each year, millions of foodborne illness cases occur all over the world.

Therefore, it is critical that all involved parties focus on ensuring safe food handling.

Employee training is key as it will encourage them to follow everyday sanitation rules and thereby reduce the chance of people becoming ill due to cross-contamination.

The training should include basic food safety practices such as personal cleanliness and good sanitation practices to prevent food product contamination.

Posters demonstrating best practices can be displayed where possible as additional support to the training.

Color Coding

The most straightforward way to put a stop to contamination and distinguish between workstations is color coding.

It is a well-known fact that the tools used for raw meat should not touch the end product.

This helps to control the risk of pathogens such as Listeria Monocytogenes, E. Coli, Salmonella and so on (Learn more about pathogens in our datasheet library).

Another advantage of changing tools for different processes is to control cross-contamination of common allergens.

In both cases, if a food manufacturing facility uses color coding to distinguish between the tools and equipment it will help to mitigate cross-contamination and support the facilities with maintaining Good Manufacturing Practices.

Identification of appropriate areas for storage, cleaning, and sanitization is also much easier with color coding tools and locations.

Occasionally, food processing facilities use unique color coding.

Food facilities can determine the colors which best suit the company’s objectives, processes, product types, and facility design.

For example, a peanut processor may select white for direct contact while a processor of milk powder might choose a different color such as green or red.

The color coding system will only work if it is properly communicated to the employees.

Clear guidance should be provided to the employees outlining the importance of the program and exactly how it should function.

The procedure should also explain the steps to take in the event of a nonconformance.

Process Flow

A cross-contamination prevention plan should also consider how the process moves across the company.

From the starting point, i.e., the receipt of the raw material, to the finished product, the process should be evaluated to understand how ingredients come into the facility and how they will be processed.

This will help to determine the crossing of product and probable points of cross-contamination.

The solution to prevent cross-contamination could be to move products in sealed packages/containers and confirm that no leakage is present.

If it is not possible or allergens are of concern, then sanitization of the area is the key.

It is also a good practice to complete the production of non-allergenic foods first and then allergens at the end of the day.

The production line should be sanitized following the last batch.

Where this is not possible, sanitization processes need to be in place in between the change of production.

Cleaning

Cross-contamination will occur if the food product comes into contact with insufficiently cleaned surfaces such as equipment, clothes, and utensils.

The efficiency of cleaning must be inspected on a regular basis and the cleaning policies should outline the systematic procedure, i.e., high-risk areas should be cleaned first.

The most dangerous source of microorganisms in a food production facility are the floor or drain.

Cleaning and sanitization of floors and drains should be repeated at the end of each production day along with precautionary measures for the duration of production to minimize the microbial growth and food safety risk.

Cross-contamination between different plant areas can be managed by using the methodical sanitation program, which you can read more about in the Validation of Cleaning Programs whitepaper.

Ahead of using cleaning chemicals and sanitizers, it is of the utmost importance that employees read and understand labels and the material safety data sheet as well as understand how to use the appropriate personal protective equipment.

They should also understand how to use signs, adhere to procedures, and be careful while moving on the wet floor.

Demo request

Cleaning is not only limited to food contact surfaces; as mentioned previously in this article, clothes are a known source of cross-contamination.

Bacteria or food particles can be transported from one place to another by means of dirty clothing and in order to stop this, clothes should be changed when moving from one production area to another.

This is especially crucial while working with high-risk foods or allergens.

A plan to eliminate cross-contamination can be put together by combining all of these different pieces. However, it still does not mean that nothing will go wrong during daily production.

The strategy of cross-contamination prevention needs to be reviewed periodically, and it may be wise to consider doing so on at least an annual basis.

The food facility will need to change its approach every time a substantial change occurs, i.e., if a new product is developed or supplier is changed.

A thorough plan that is rigorously enforced will help identify and tackle any weaknesses in the process flow, containing and resolving issues within the facility and preventing cross-contaminated products from reaching consumers.

https://safefood360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Cross-contamination-1.png 1391 2778 https://safefood360.com/wp-content/uploads/Ideagen-Safefood-360-Vertical-Logo.svg 2018-04-30 15:26:042023-06-22 09:52:47Facing and Controlling Cross-Contamination in Food Processing

The Power of the Big Picture

in blog, Food Safety Knowledge

When it comes to mentioning the names of great modern leaders one that does not immediately come to mind is Gene Kranz. For me this is a shame since I believe he has a lot to teach us when it comes to understanding Compliance and Risk. For those hearing his name for the first time, Gene Kranz was the Flight Director at NASA during the Gemini and Apollo programs. He is best known for serving as flight director during the first lunar landing of Apollo 11. He also gained distinction for his role in directing the successful Mission Control team efforts to save the crew of Apollo 13. Kranz is also the author of the book “Failure is Not an Option” covering the subjects of risk, leadership, and teams.

What’s most interesting about him, unlike better-known leaders, is that Kranz was never shy of laying his soul bare.  Allow me to explain… When historians approach the task of writing the history of their national heroes, they seldom if ever mention their failures. Instead, our leaders are invariably perfect in their heroics – powerful and omnipotent. Popular culture displays little tolerance for heroes who are human and fallible. That is, leaders who are just as capable of failure as well as success. This presents a problem for leadership, our leaders and those who follow them. Leadership is a human endeavor. It finds its expression in men and women who intrinsically display the necessary trait of solving problems. Similarly, humans are hardwired to recognize these leadership traits. It makes sense for the species and its survival. Leadership when effective can mobilize the collective effort of humans to achieve great things (moon landings) which as individuals would otherwise be impossible. But by elevating leaders and leadership to the realms of deity we fail to understand the true nature and benefits of great leadership. Dealing with Failures!

Kranz has the distinction of being the flight director of what was arguably man’s greatest technological achievement – “landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to earth”. By the same token, he also led the team of Apollo 13. This mission failed to land on the moon and almost saw the loss of the crew. However, through his leadership, he mobilized his team to ensure their safe return to earth. The mission became known as the “Successful Failure”. Kranz excelled as a leader because he understood the true nature of risk, teams, data and decision making. When the command module of Apollo 13 exploded and all around him in mission control were losing their heads, Kranz provided leadership when it was most needed. He addressed his team clearly saying;

“Let’s look at this thing from a standpoint of status. What have we got on the spacecraft that’s good?”

Kranz understood clearly that to solve the issue his team needed to look beyond the microdata and focus on the bigger picture of Status. So, what does any of this have to do with Food Safety Management and Safefood 360’s new StatusBI Feature? The answer is a lot. Let’s start with the basics.

The Objectives of Food Safety Management

The primary objectives of any food safety management system are:

  1. To ensure Compliance with legislative and customer requirements
  2. To eliminate or reduce to an acceptable level the Risk of food poisoning

In order to achieve these objectives, food businesses globally undertake the implementation of a food safety system which meets relevant legal requirements and increasingly obtain third-party certification under one of the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) Standards. The underlying assumption is that full implementation of these requirements will have the effect of reducing risk and maintaining compliance.

The True Nature of Food Safety Management Systems

Let’s look closer at what this means in practice. We need to understand the actual nature of the typical food safety management system. The objective is twofold

  1. Increase Compliance
  2. Reduce Risk.

When companies come to developing and maintaining their food safety management systems they put in place specific activities defined under the regulatory standards. For example, the company may develop a set of cleaning activities for its plant and equipment for reasons that are evident. The company may also put in place specific monitoring programs for processes measuring various things like temperature, times, pressures, and microbiological, physical and chemical hazards in food. Extending it further, the company may also put in place management processes such as complaints management, internal auditing, CAPA management and so on. There is nothing unusual about any of this, except we often overlook its true nature.

Food Safety Systems are in essence a collection of numerous tasks, jobs, and measurements.

For simplicity, let’s call all of these ‘Actions’. The number and complexity of these Actions can vary from operation to operation but in all cases, this collection of Actions represents your FSM. But why do we put these actions in place? What are we trying to achieve? These questions may sound obvious but their answers may be somewhat less so.

Blog anchor food safety software oversight

Let’s look closer. When a food business puts in place any specific action under FSM it is making one simple assumption or statement of intent;

This Action will increase my Compliance and reduce my Risk.

Whether or not the food business is conscious of this, they are essentially making this declaration.

Seeing the Big Picture

Let me make another statement of fact. The vast majority of food safety outbreaks come from food businesses who have in place compliant and certified food safety management systems. This should tell us a lot about how we approach food safety management.

In attempting to get the system set up and maintained, food businesses often focus on the micro level outputs of these Actions – a single internal audit result, specific status of CAPA’s or individual test results. Of course, this should be done and is necessary to meet your objectives of safe and legal food products, however, a predominance of food safety micromanagement outputs can make it difficult to identify macro-level trends which can alert you to emerging and significant issues in your organization.

A predominance of food safety micromanagement outputs can make it difficult to identify macro-level trends which can alert you to emerging and significant issues in your organization.

Before we start berating ourselves too much, let us consider some practical issues. Food safety management systems which are correctly set up against requirements have an annoying tendency to generate a massive volume of data. In fact, the data can be generated at such a rate that it is almost impossible to assimilate it before another avalanche of data arrives. The effect of this is simple – we lose insight and oversight of the macro picture! In the context of any management system (including food safety), this leads to management by opinion rather than by objective fact. This, in turn, leads to reduced compliance or increased risk.

In other words, the underlying principle of the food safety management system (increased compliance / reduced risk) is undermined by the very burden the system creates. Moreover, this state of affairs leads to a lost opportunity to genuinely drive improvement since the data has massive potential value. It contains all the required information to have full oversight of your current compliance and risk status.

Data Noise and Overload

We cannot escape the volume of data generated by food safety systems. We need it to gain certification and do business. But it can create a deafening noise and overload our attempts to figure out where we actually are in regard to compliance and risk. Food safety management is a human-driven process. Regardless of the level of automation, humans ultimately review, determine and action food safety data. Difficulties arise when humans attempt to make decisions based on the volumes of data coming from our mountain of food safety Actions.

Particularly in times of crisis we need to know the Status of the situation. In the absence of a crisis, we still need to know the Status. We need to see the big picture, the trends, and the pertinent data only. And this is what Safefood 360’s StatusBI Feature is all about.

Particularly in times of crisis we need to know the Status of the situation.

Safefood 360 Status

Safefood 360° are proud to announce the launch of our new Business Intelligence (BI) feature – Safefood 360 StatusBI. Launching in April 2018, this new system-wide tool has ground-breaking features which for the first time provide food safety and technical managers with real-time oversight of their entire operation. Safefood 360 StatusBI is a powerful business intelligence tool which is fully embedded into the Safefood 360° platform. It will provide users with the ability to develop smart:

  • Interactive Reports
  • Embedded Dashboards
  • Self Service Reports and Data Exploration

Making BI Intelligent

Safefood 360 StatusBI is the next evolution in food safety management. In addition to the normal BI features you expect, Safefood 360° has added its decades of working in food safety to make BI even smarter. Here’s what we have done…

Demo request

As mentioned above, the ultimate aim of any food safety manager is to know two key pieces of information at any given moment:

  • What is the current level of Compliance?
  • What is the likely Risk of something going wrong?

StatusBI now makes it possible to determine the current level of Compliance and Risk of your Business Group, Business Units, Supply Chain and individual Manufacturing Units in real-time. More than this, it is also possible to measure both Compliance and Risk down to the module and record level.

Compliance

Risk

Based on a combination of validated criteria applied to all Actions in Safefood 360° the system calculates the current Compliance rating and Risk level. This allows you to focus on the bigger picture and drill down when required to where the issues live. You can quickly find any plant, module, supplier, action or master data entity contributing to poor Risk or Compliance. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. The solution will also provide new, enhanced analytics in the areas of supply quality management and governance indicators by both supplier and supply chain map.

https://safefood360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Power-of-the-big-picture.png 1390 2778 https://safefood360.com/wp-content/uploads/Ideagen-Safefood-360-Vertical-Logo.svg 2018-02-13 15:42:062022-11-01 12:13:06The Power of the Big Picture
Page 3 of 3123
Recent
  • Ideagen Safefood360 logo
    Ideagen launches comprehensive food and beverage compliance...
  • Webinar Cover Image Play
    [Watch] The Economic Benefits to Food Manufacturers Implementing...
  • Radura Symbol 1
    An Introduction to the basics of Food Irradiation
  • Food Fraud 1
    Protecting Our Food: Effectively Tackling Food Fraud
  • Data security 1
    How we ensure trust and security in our software platfo...
  • The Hidden Costs of Food Safety Non Compliance 7 1
    The Costs of Food Safety Non-Compliance: How to Avoid Financial...
  • PDSA blog cover
    Using the Plan Do Study Act Cycle for Better Food Safety...
  • The Answer To Food Safety Digital Transformation Challenges
    The Challenges of Digital Transformation in Food Safety:...
  • SSO
    What is Single Sign On and why do we offer it?  
  • Alcoa Principles What can the food industry learn from life sciences
    Alcoa+ Principles: What can the food industry learn from...
  • Hero image 3
    Introducing Audit Management 360: Better Food Safety Au...
  • Webinar1 SPC 1058 530
    Unlocking the Power of SPC in Food Safety: A Webinar Re...
  • Webinar 2 Mastering Operational and GMP Auditing A Comprehensive Guide to Best Practices 1058 530
    Unveiling the Secrets to Mastery in Operational & GMP...
  • Safefood 360 is top performer on sourceforge in Summer 2023
    Safefood 360°: Top Performer Summer 2023 at SourceForg...
  • RISK Jun 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (June 2023)
  • RISK May 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (May 2023)
  • sf360 Single sign on
    Should I implement single sign-on (SSO) for food safety...
  • How do Chemical Hazards Occur in the food safety process 1
    How do Chemical Hazards occur in the Food Safety Proces...
  • RISK Apr 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (April 2023) by Safefood 360°...
  • How do Physical Hazards Occur in the Food Safety Process 1
    How do Physical Hazards Occur in the Food Safety Proces...
  • The high cost of Cross contamination in the food sector
    The High Cost of Cross-Contamination in the Food Sector
  • RISK Mar 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (March 2023) by Safefood 360°...
  • RISK Feb 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (February 2023) by Safefood 360°...
  • RISK jan 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (January 2023) by Safefood 360°...
  • Novel Food Regulation
    Novel Food Regulation: EFSA versus FDA
  • RISK Dec 2022 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (December 2022) by Safefood 360°...
  • RISK Nov 2022 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (November 2022) by Safefood 360°...
  • Blog post image 13
    Complete Guide to Food Cooking Temperature Control
  • RISK Oct 2022 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (October 2022) by Safefood 360°...
  • Blog post image 8 1
    7 Ways Compliance Management Platforms Improve Operational...
Popular
  • CCP PRP blog
    Understanding the difference between PRP, OPRP & CCP...
  • fsma harpc guidance
    The difference between HACCP and HARPC. A case of the Emperor’s...
  • Auditing
    New checklist available for TS ISO 22002
  • thanks for c360
    Thank you for Connect 360°
Comments
  • Florian BroughWe noticed that your website safefood360.com is getting...5 October 2025 - by Florian Brough
  • Javier CoronesAttract high-quality visitors to your site with our AI-driven...5 October 2025 - by Javier Corones
  • binance sign up bonusThanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool,...4 October 2025 - by binance sign up bonus
  • Natali ContiWEBINAR: Watch Us Build a Complete AI-Powered Local Marketing...4 October 2025 - by Natali Conti
Tags
food safety food standard and legislation Implementation pandemic Professional Services Report RISK Risk Assessment Tool supply chain webinar

Archives

Frame 16

Safefood 360°, built by a group of food safety experts in 2010, is designed to tackle the real difficulties facing food-related industries by combining Food Safety Management and Supplier Quality Management Solutions with over 35 pre-set modules – creating a fast, secure, and audit-ready working environment.

Follow us
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn

Solutions

  • Food Safety Management
  • Supplier Quality Management Software
  • StatusBI Business Intelligence
  • Audit Management 360

Support

  • Technical Support
  • Professional Services
  • Password Reset Instructions
  • Accepting an invitation from Safefood 360°
  • Frequently Asked Questions

Resources

  • Whitepapers
  • Technical Data Sheets
  • Webinars
  • Tools
  • Presentations
  • Privacy Policy
© Copyright – 2026 Ideagen
Scroll to top