• X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact us
  • Login
Safefood 360°
  • More Information
    • Solutions For:
      • Food Safety Management
      • Supplier Quality Management
      • Enterprise Food Safety
      • Audit Management 360
      • Business Intelligence Dashboards
      • Remote Working and Oversight
    • Technology
      • Software Modules
      • Platform & Data Security
      • Available Languages
      • Standards We Support
  • By Industry
    • Bakeries
    • Seafood Processors
    • Beverage Manufacturers
    • Pet Food & Animal Feed
  • Customer Stories
    • Testimonials
    • UK: Butternut Box
    • EU: Royal FrieslandCampina
    • EU: Hofseth
    • USA: Bluegrass Ingredients
  • Support
    • Technical Support
    • Professional Services
    • Customer Success
    • Education & Training
  • Resources
    • ROI Calculator
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Datasheets
      • Physical Hazard Series
      • Chemical Hazard Series
      • Microbiological Hazard Series
      • Food Safety Management Series
    • Presentations
    • Ebooks
    • Tools
  • Blog
  • Company
    • About Safefood 360°
    • About LGC Assure
    • Contact Us
  • Demo Request
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • More Information
    • Solutions For:
      • Food Safety Management
      • Supplier Quality Management
      • Enterprise Food Safety
      • Audit Management 360
      • Business Intelligence Dashboards
      • Remote Working and Oversight
    • Technology
      • Software Modules
      • Platform & Data Security
      • Available Languages
      • Standards We Support
  • By Industry
    • Bakeries
    • Seafood Processors
    • Beverage Manufacturers
    • Pet Food & Animal Feed
  • Customer Stories
    • Testimonials
    • UK: Butternut Box
    • EU: Royal FrieslandCampina
    • EU: Hofseth
    • USA: Bluegrass Ingredients
  • Support
    • Technical Support
    • Professional Services
    • Customer Success
    • Education & Training
  • Resources
    • ROI Calculator
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Datasheets
      • Physical Hazard Series
      • Chemical Hazard Series
      • Microbiological Hazard Series
      • Food Safety Management Series
    • Presentations
    • Ebooks
    • Tools
  • Blog
  • Company
    • About Safefood 360°
    • About LGC Assure
    • Contact Us
  • Demo Request
44670675 ml

Do we need all these different food safety standards?

in blog

I don’t hear a lot of people questioning the status quo when it comes to having multiple global food safety standards, but let me play the devils advocate here.

As you know, there are a number of different food safety standards that you could get certified to: SQF, BRC, ISO 22000, IFS and so on. The biggest schemes are GFSI benchmarked, which means they all meet certain criteria.

When you want to go to the retail channels, many retailers accept any GFSI certification as evidence that your quality management system is sufficiently good for becoming a supplier. Doesn’t this mean that all these standards are more or less similar?

Sure, there are big differences from one standard to another when you really read into them, but it seems that being successfully certified to any one of the standards can help your processes and system reach a desired level. I have never heard that food produced in an SQF-certified facility would be even safer than food that’s produced under IFS standards!

Maintaining multiple standards is inefficient but necessary

I sometimes liken the situation with these competing standards to the situation with private health insurance. It’s just an inefficient way of solving a problem that in its core is not that difficult to solve. It’s one of these areas where, yes you can have some competition, but it doesn’t necessarily add any new positive innovation into the market. Sometimes the energy is spent on marketing and selling and maintaining the market share.

Many times incentives in a competitive environment work against the greater good: When financial rating agencies started competing for the same customers it actually led to slipping standards across the board. No one wanted to be the strict standard on the market. So in the financial market we saw two games where rating agencies were tough in public, but in reality they would allow banks to get away with whatever they wanted. I’m not saying that food safety standards are similar, but you get the point.

Am I suggesting there should be just one internationally recognized standard for food safety? Probably not. I’m just making the observation that having more standards doesn’t necessarily allow us to focus on the right things.

We see for instance the introduction of food defense into the standards – because it’s currently an exciting topic. In reality, most companies haven’t properly wrapped their head around even HACCP. So adding new, more nuanced requirements as part of unnecessary competition between standards is why people can’t see the wood for the trees.

Why do we have multiple standards?

We do need different layers of standards because not all standards apply to the same group. It is practical to have some baseline standards that apply to all of us, and stricter standards that only apply to some of us.

standards e1454079169137

So there is always a need to have a set of layers. But variation within those layers is less needed.

Will one standard emerge as a winner?

Lets look at certification and competing food safety standards as a kind of free marketplace for ideas. Ultimately the best standard should be the one that is a) able to assure your production process meets high standards, b) able to guarantee your access to markets and channels, c) is operationally efficient. Then why is it that we haven’t really seen the emergence of one major standard that would dominate the market similarly like Windows dominates the operating systems market? Instead we have more than five standards, all more or less the same, none over the other in global popularity.

We are seeing indications that ISO 22000 is going to come out on the top as the global standard because it covers the general requirements for food safety. And we can add additional chapters to it – for instance FSSC 22000 – that make it specific to manufacturing. So this one remains still an open question for the future.

Food safety is universally shared

Two months ago we were in Barcelona at the BRC conference and we met people from all over Europe. Everyone had gathered in one place, sharing a common goal.

Also, as part of my job I have had the pleasure of visiting clients anywhere from Shanghai to Toronto. And no matter where I’ve met a food safety person, we’ve always had a common language and a common goal even if we didn’t speak the same mother tongue. Everyone has the need to produce safe food and food safety is a science that anyone can learn.

Food safety, as a process and as an occupation, is extremely similar from one country to another and it is far less dependent on culture and local tradition than perhaps some other areas of management are. And unlike other functions like sales, strategy or marketing, that are highly competitive in nature, food safety is actually highly collaborative. It’s amazing how openly companies are dealing with each other when it comes to food safety management.

The point I am obviously trying to make here is that food safety is something that we all share. And we don’t need multiple standards to make that observation.

GFSI was the first step toward unification

GFSI is a global initiative of bringing different food safety systems together and harmonizing practices across the globe.

We at Safefood 360° love the idea of GFSI, because their vision is highly similar to our vision of bringing all food safety processes and standards together in one product.

It’s probably not going to be GFSI that comes out with a global standard at any time time soon, because it’s even written into their mission statement not to start creating standards of their own. But some organization like WTO or FAO could in theory go one step further and try to coordinate a global standard that would be universally recognized. Even more likely is that the market share from ISO 22000 grows.

The interpreter

At Safefood 360°, we sometimes view our job as being a kind of an interpreter who attempts to unify all the standards into one software platform. We take in all the complexities of food safety standards and translate that analysis into something universally understood. We think there is only one way a corrective action needs to be handled, one way an audit should be approached as a process, etc.

When Safefood 360° was started some five years ago we spent over 6 months analyzing all major standards and legal frameworks and working it into the blueprint of the software. This work was only made possible because food safety management is universally shared and its based on the same science everywhere. Did you know that Safefood 360° is used on every continent at this stage and every single customer is using the same software without any custom modifications? Our customers are certified to a plethora of standards.

Apart from some local slang, it seems that food safety is almost like a universal language that brings companies and cultures together.

What do you think – do you feel that we will need the competition of different standards even in the future?

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://safefood360.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/44670675_ml.jpg 1370 1370 /wp-content/uploads/2015/04/sf360-logo.png 2015-10-29 13:44:122016-03-15 13:52:05Do we need all these different food safety standards?
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent
  • Radura Symbol 1
    An Introduction to the basics of Food Irradiation
  • Food Fraud 1
    Protecting Our Food: Effectively Tackling Food Fraud
  • Data security 1
    How we ensure trust and security in our software platfo...
  • The Hidden Costs of Food Safety Non Compliance 7 1
    The Costs of Food Safety Non-Compliance: How to Avoid Financial...
  • PDSA blog cover
    Using the Plan Do Study Act Cycle for Better Food Safety...
  • The Answer To Food Safety Digital Transformation Challenges
    The Challenges of Digital Transformation in Food Safety:...
  • SSO
    What is Single Sign On and why do we offer it?  
  • Alcoa Principles What can the food industry learn from life sciences
    Alcoa+ Principles: What can the food industry learn from...
  • Hero image 3
    Introducing Audit Management 360: Better Food Safety Au...
  • Webinar1 SPC 1058 530
    Unlocking the Power of SPC in Food Safety: A Webinar Re...
  • Webinar 2 Mastering Operational and GMP Auditing A Comprehensive Guide to Best Practices 1058 530
    Unveiling the Secrets to Mastery in Operational & GMP...
  • Safefood 360 is top performer on sourceforge in Summer 2023
    Safefood 360°: Top Performer Summer 2023 at SourceForg...
  • RISK Jun 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (June 2023)
  • RISK May 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (May 2023)
  • sf360 Single sign on
    Should I implement single sign-on (SSO) for food safety...
  • How do Chemical Hazards Occur in the food safety process 1
    How do Chemical Hazards occur in the Food Safety Proces...
  • RISK Apr 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (April 2023) by Safefood 360°...
  • How do Physical Hazards Occur in the Food Safety Process 1
    How do Physical Hazards Occur in the Food Safety Proces...
  • The high cost of Cross contamination in the food sector
    The High Cost of Cross-Contamination in the Food Sector
  • RISK Mar 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (March 2023) by Safefood 360°...
  • RISK Feb 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (February 2023) by Safefood 360°...
  • RISK jan 2023 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (January 2023) by Safefood 360°...
  • Novel Food Regulation
    Novel Food Regulation: EFSA versus FDA
  • RISK Dec 2022 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (December 2022) by Safefood 360°...
  • RISK Nov 2022 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (November 2022) by Safefood 360°...
  • Blog post image 13
    Complete Guide to Food Cooking Temperature Control
  • RISK Oct 2022 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (October 2022) by Safefood 360°...
  • Blog post image 8 1
    7 Ways Compliance Management Platforms Improve Operational...
  • 6 Ways
    6 Ways to Implement Preventive Measures and Controls For...
  • RISK sep 2022 report
    Food Safety Alert Update (September 2022) by Safefood 360°...
Popular
  • CCP PRP blog
    Understanding the difference between PRP, OPRP & CCP...
  • fsma harpc guidance
    The difference between HACCP and HARPC. A case of the Emperor’s...
  • Auditing
    New checklist available for TS ISO 22002
  • thanks for c360
    Thank you for Connect 360°
Comments
  • Barry ONeillThank you Cyril! Glad to hear you enjoyed it.31 October 2023 - by Barry ONeill
  • cyril periappuramExcellent presentation, Thank you for your contribution...27 October 2023 - by cyril periappuram
  • Gay KSend me info on what foods and drinks and water having MRA...20 June 2023 - by Gay K
  • AmrikDear Sanika , we want to use one line to be able to ...9 February 2023 - by Amrik
Tags
food safety food standard and legislation Implementation pandemic Professional Services Report RISK Risk Assessment Tool supply chain webinar

Archives

Frame 16

Safefood 360°, built by a group of food safety experts in 2010, is designed to tackle the real difficulties facing food-related industries by combining Food Safety Management and Supplier Quality Management Solutions with over 35 pre-set modules – creating a fast, secure, and audit-ready working environment.

Follow us
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn

Solutions

  • Food Safety Management
  • Supplier Quality Management Software
  • StatusBI Business Intelligence
  • Audit Management 360

Support

  • Technical Support
  • Professional Services
  • Password Reset Instructions
  • Accepting an invitation from Safefood 360°
  • Frequently Asked Questions

Resources

  • Whitepapers
  • Technical Data Sheets
  • Webinars
  • Tools
  • Presentations
  • Privacy Policy
© Copyright – Safefood 360°
Developing advanced food safety reports and dashboards using external BI so...46780974 mlimproving food safetyWorking your way towards a better food safety management system
Scroll to top